NOTICE REGARDING TEMPORARY CHANGE AT WAYTOOHIGH.COM
May 16, 2008WayTooHigh.com - The Credit Card Interchange Report is temporarily terminating this site. Check back periodically for updates.
WayTooHigh.com - The Credit Card Interchange Report is temporarily terminating this site. Check back periodically for updates.
Now that an average 18-wheeler gas fill-up costs about $1,200, next time you see a truck take notice that they are helping to fund Visa, MasterCard and its member banks cardholder reward schemes. As trucking industry drivers use plastic to pay for topping off their tanks, about $25.00 merchant interchange fees are immediately funneled to the card associations and their member banks. When you review technological advancementsand the laws of efficiency, just how much of that $25.00 help support the electronic payment network? According to published reports, the cost to process an electronic transaction is about 13 percent - That means that the cost is about $3.25 from the standard 18-wheeler truck fill-up, while $21.75 (87%) helps explain why the merchant interchange fees are broken and unfair.
Click here to read the May 14th ConsumerAffairs.com article by Martin Bosworth. Reprinted below.
By Martin Bosworth, May 14, ConsumerAffairs.com
The House Judiciary Committee has scheduled hearings on legislation that would rein in credit card interchange fees tomorrow. The hearing will be preceded by a frenzy of lobbying as retailers square off against the financial industry over the hidden fees that retailers pay to process credit card transactions.
The hearing will discuss the “Credit Card Fair Fee Act of 2008,”introduced in March by Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers (D-MI). The proposed legislation would require lenders and credit card companies to negotiate with retailers on terms for interchange fees, and for the Federal Trade Commission and the Justice Department to step in and arbitrate if an agreement could not be reached.
Currently, interchange fees are set by credit card companies such as Visa and Mastercard, and the payments are often high enough to wipe out a store’s profit on any sold item, forcing them to raise prices for all customers just to recoup their losses. A coalition of retailers banded together to sue both companies and many major banks for what they claim was collusion in setting interchange fee profits
Photo store [and ScanMyPhotos.com co-]owner Mitch Goldstone, one of the lead advocates of eliminating interchange fees, said that “We are ready to explain why interchange fees are obsolete, illegal and anti-competitive.” In a posting on his blog, WayTooHigh.Com, Goldstone said that “After years of toil, merchants and consumers are at the cusp of forcing the demise of these unbridled and unnecessary interchange fees on American’s and our neighbors around the world.”
Both the retailer litigation and threats of proposed new regulations have conspired to bring together credit unions and national banks–traditionally old foes–to oppose the legislation. The Hill reported that both sides plan to bombard Capitol Hill with advertising urging Congress to oppose legislation restricting interchange fees.
Retailers and interchange fee opponents hope to take advantage of the zeitgeist surrounding credit card, as several members of both the House and Senate have introduced new legislation that would curb the most abusive practices of the industry, and have held multiple hearings decrying the more unscrupulous tactics of the financial industry against its customers.
Even with continuing healthy profits for both credit card companies and highly successful IPOs, both Visa and Mastercard are rumored to fear a “perfect storm” combining the elimination of the interchange fees, lower card usage and higher delinquencies due to the economic climate, and restriction of many of the fees levied on consumers.
Industry analysts have observed that one of the principal motives for both Visa and Mastercard to go public was to build up “war chests” for funds to recover losses if the interchange fee litigation should go against them–and to shift the bulk of the risk to shareholders and investors.
[source: Unfair Credit Card Fees.com]
WayTooHigh.com - The Credit Card Interchange Report Comments:
This is the “perfect storm.”
Understanding the Word “Insolvency” Is Crystal Clear
Visa Inc. Files 10-K Annual Report, Amends S-1 Registration
The House Antitrust and Competition Policy Task Force holds a hearing on the Credit Card Fair Fee Act of 2008 to ensure competitive market-based rates and terms for merchants’ access to electronic payment systems. Thursday 05/15/2008 - 11:00 AM; 2141 Rayburn House Office Building, Judiciary Committee Antitrust Task Force.
Visa and MasterCard profiting from a devastating natural disaster?
This is another image crisis for the two leading credit card associations and their thousands of member banks. When the public understands that with each electronic payment donation to help the people affected by the Asian cyclone, Visa and Mastercard are doing more than clearing the charges. They are reaping profits from a global tragedy. There should be additional pressure placed on their continued profiteering - this time at the expense of vital aid needed for that region of the world, ratherthan to help fund the banks’ other fiscal missteps.
If you thought that Visa, MasterCard and thousands of banks were heartless by reaping windfall profits during our economic energy crisis and record fuel prices, just wait. Even more dismaying than forcing credit and debit card holders to pay upwards of $2.50 for merchant interchange fees when they pay at the pump, is the current Asian disaster.
The United Nations estimates 1.5 million people have been “severely affected” by the May 2nd cyclone that swept through Myanmar. The death toll in that Cyclone-ravaged region could hit hundreds of thousands of people. What are Visa and MasterCard doing? As far as we know, every time an electronic payment donation is sent to The American Red Cross and other relief efforts, the two leading credit card associations and their thousands of member banks make a profit. The interchange fee, which could be upwards of 2.0% from each donation is being delivered to financial institutions, rather than in direct aid to the people in need.
Even with this horrendously inappropriate level of profiteering, your help is needed. Our ScanMyPhotos.com blog: Tales from the World of Photo Scanning has more info on how you can help.
Even worse is that the American Red Cross is in violation of their credit card merchant agreement and is risking disqualification from Visa and MasterCard because nation’s premier emergency response organization demands a minimum electronic payment of $5.00. Click here to read how they explain the merchant interchange fee issue.
Will Visa and MasterCard waive its interchange fees for American Red Cross and other related transactions?
As the pressure grows for Citigroup Inc’s new CEO, Vikram Pandit to address the troubled bank’s missteps, I wonder whether he has the influence to make the call to Visa and MasterCard on behalf of all the card associations’ member banks?
Are Visa and MasterCard Merchants Violating Their Rules?
“Tragedy of Dead and Survivors in Myanmar Grows Worse” (via Aung Hla Tun reporting for Reuters)
Before reprinting today’s Visa Inc. press release, these thoughts:
Our merchant interchange antitrust litigation is based on many years of alleged illegal activities. Just as if a convicted bank robber apologizes and cleans up their act, they are still in violation of the law. So too are Visa and MasterCard. Because most of the same banks that control a large percentage of Visa’s newly public shares are also owners of MasterCard, we expect that the same decision will be forthcoming by the other credit card association.
Moving forward, this is a smart decision and one more confirming action that Visa recognizes that they were in error and are quickly trying to fix their business model; from creating an independent board, to less ownership by the banks, to posting interchange rates online (although mostly as an attempt to respond to merchant concerns) and now this.
The Visa Inc. May 9th press release is reprinted below.
——————————–
Visa Inc. Makes Operating Regulations Available to the Public
Move Seeks to Increase Company’s Transparency
SAN FRANCISCO, CA, May 8, 2008
Visa Inc. announced today that it will for the first time make its Visa International and Regional Operating Regulations available publicly, effective May 15, 2008.
The Operating Regulations, which will be available on Visa’s corporate website at www.corporate.visa.com, are the set of rules which govern the participation of issuing and acquiring financial institutions in the Visa system.
“As Visa continues to evolve to meet the needs of customers, we are committed to providing our partners and interested parties with greater insight into Visa’s operations,” says Joseph W. Saunders, Chairman and CEO, Visa Inc. “Greater transparency is one of the ways we hope to strengthen our working relationships in the marketplace.”
Previously, Visa Inc. made its Visa USA Operating Regulations available to merchants and third party agents under a non-disclosure agreement. On May 15, Visa’s rules will be publicly available to interested parties, including all Visa rules related to merchants’ participation in the system. However, to protect cardholder and merchant safety and the Visa system, Visa has omitted proprietary and competitive information, as well as certain details from the rules relating to the security of the network. For example, in the merchant rules, Visa has omitted authorization limits by country and processing codes which could aid fraudsters.
“Today’s announcement builds on our commitment to making Visa transparent in an increasingly competitive environment,” adds Saunders. “While our operating regulations only govern our client financial institutions, we believe that merchants and others will benefit from access to the rules, which provide a greater understanding of the complexities of electronic payments.”
| Tell Your Elected Representatives to Support HR 5546, The Credit Card Fair Fee Act | |
Tell your elected representatives to support HR 5546, The Credit Card Fair Fee Act which stops the price-fixing by the credit card industry and provides an open and transparent process to negotiate credit card interchange fees.
Send your message now. Click here.
[Source: UnfairCreditCardFees.com]
Click hBentz, ere to view the CNBC News segment.
Merchants do not have a “wonderful relationship” with Visa and MasterCard. Fact is we are suing them for what could amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in antitrust violations.
There is no transparency for inter interchange fees. Ask any merchant what any single electronic payment transaction was. If Visa and MasterCard want transparency, post the exact charge on every credit card receipt. Posting upwards of one-hundred pages on their website with encrypted interchange fee codes is not transparent.
Consumers do not know that they are being charged nearly 2% in interchange fees.
Interchange fees are illegally set by Visa, MasterCard and its member banks. This is illegal and identical to what the railroads did in the 1800s which forced the creation of the Sherman Antitrust act.
There is no competition. Visa and MasterCard control 80% of the entire electronic payment network. The fees are not competitive, any more than OPEC is competitive with its similar cartel-like pricing.
Click here to read the CNNMoney May 7th article
Where are the U.S. presidential candidates on the issue of Visa and MasterCard’s merchant interchange fees?
Their silence is almost as concerning as are their lack of initiatives to boost support for the U.S. currency. With today’s news that crude-oil futures reached a record of $121.49 a barrel, more attention must be directed to Visa and MasterCard’s cartel scheme to force service stations, all merchants and consumers to hand over more than $40 billion each year in questionable merchant interchange fees.
If the presidential candidates really wanted to draw attention to unfair gas hikes, they should look beyond temporary tax fixes and instead demand that Visa, MasterCard and its member banks address this issue and how it impacts our nation’s economic energy crisis. Each motorist fill-up means that Visa and MasterCard’s member banks reap upwards of $2.50 when credit cards are used. Think of the trucking industry and the cost for diesel fuel and how much more money is being syphoned off and into the pockets of Visa and MasterCard and its member banks.
This interchange fee system is long broken, antiquated and must be fixed. The national media attention’s spotlight on the presidential candidates would be an ideal forum to supplement what WayTooHigh.com - The Credit Card Interchange Report has been championing for more than three years.
From PaymentsNews.com, they have assembled a link to several of the most recent and favorite payments and banking blogs.
Two of the presidential candidates jumped into the nation’s economic energy crisis today by proposing a “gas tax holiday” to save motorists money.
Senator Barack Obama, was smart and chose not to side with Senator’s Clinton and McCain. And, if the presidential hopeful really want to make an impact, rather than just reducing the record prices at the pumps by temporarily lowering taxes, he should demand that Visa and MasterCard immediately remove their merchant interchange fees at all service stations. Just look at both card association’s record earnings this week [28% quarterly increase for Visa and more than doubling for MasterCard] to understand why this is a national imperative. There is a reason Visa and MasterCard’s stocks are soaring - windfall profiteering at the pumps
The argument that American’s are entering the peak driving season, and thus will increase demand on prices is wrong. Motorists are driving less, and getting rid of their gas guzzling vehicles in exchange for more economical automobiles. Even at ScanMyPhotos.com, we are providing free gas cards to help soften the effects from consumers driving less. Last week, The Los Angeles Times and the Associated Press reported on our campaign for providing free gas.
So far, none of the presidential candidates have pointed fingers at Visa and MasterCard and its member banks for their windfall profiteering from charging upwards of $2.50 in credit card interchange fees every time a motorist fills-up with a credit card.
Today’s Associated Press story, “Charges Fly Over Shops’ Credit-Card Fees: Retailers, Credit Card Companies Battle Over ‘Biggest Credit Card Fee You’ve Never Heard Of,’” has a new twist.
Click here to read the article.
MasterCard’s spokesperson, Sharon Gamsin explained that “The company’s interchange rate has risen less than the rate of inflation…” Nice point if you didn’t understand that the same technology, innovations and unparalleled growth of telecommunications services that make electronic payments more efficient. These Moore’s Law advances that should bring down costs (every 18 months costs should be reduced in half) have led to international phone calls for just pennies a minute, a trilobite of memory for a few hundred dollars and so on.
The point is that MasterCard and Visa’s credit card cartel and its interchange fee pricing structure should not be put in the same equation as the rate of inflation. These are not eggs and milk; it’s an electronic payment network that relies to a grater degree on the logic of Moore’s Law. If that were the case, then lap top computers, cell phones and other technology products would be rising, not declining.
As for the price of an international phone call, could you imagine what it would be pre-phone card and back when AT&T held its anticompetitive monopoly?
If today’s near debauchery in an American city over the Olympic torch relay is any indication of what’s to come, Visa Inc. and its Olympic sponsorship must also be in question. The International Olympic Committee and the world is watching, so too are the millions of merchants that accept Visa, along with the millions of Visa cardholders. The opposition to the Beijing Olympics is gaining attention and ferocity. The message over this summer’s Olympics is clear and if you thought Visa and MasterCard’s interchange battle was cemented in protest, just wait.
YouTube scenes from protesters in U.S. on April 9th
Visa 2008 Olympic Games National Promotion
“Confusion along San Francisco Olympic torch route” (via Reuters)
Click here to read the April 8th Wall Street Journal “Letter to the editor” from Rep. John Conyers (D., Mich.), Chairman House Judiciary Committee and Rep. Chris Cannon (R., Utah), Ranking Member House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law.
—————————————————-
In the Journal’s March 29 editorial, “Credit-Card Wars,” you note that, “as consumers we’d like to see interchange fees come down too, but through market innovation and competition, not Congressional fiat.” We agree. That’s why we introduced the bipartisan Credit Card Fair Fee Act: It facilitates direct negotiations between merchants and the credit card industry on interchange fees.
This approach is necessary because of concerns about coordinated price fixing among issuers leading to less competition and higher rates. For example, Visa has increased the average interchange rate 17% (26 basis points) in recent years despite dramatically improved processing technology and rapidly rising card volume. As the Journal notes, “Economies of scale should be driving [interchange] fees down, as in most other service-fee industries.”
In fact, Americans pay nearly three times as much on average as Europeans in credit-card interchange fees for the same set of services — nearly 2% of every retail purchase. This amounts to nearly $36 billion imposed on consumers through higher retail prices. And the interchange fee is the largest credit-card fee of all — dwarfing credit-card late fees, over-the-limit fees, balance transfer fees, annual fees, inactivity fees, penalty interest fees, and even ATM bank fees.
Yet the editorial says the market will ride to the rescue and bring down excessive credit-card interchange fees. That is unlikely unless there are negotiations and proceedings as set forth in our legislation. In an economy in which, as the Journal notes, credit transactions are now king and cash has been dethroned, how can the vast majority of merchants turn down plastic from the two major credit-card companies, who control approximately 80% of the market?
We introduced the Credit Card Fair Fee Act to create an open and transparent environment that doesn’t exist today, one that will not only spur the major credit-card companies to negotiate fairly on interchange but also to provide the opening for lower-cost interchange credit-card brands. Our bill would lead to competitive market-based interchange rates and terms.
Rep. John Conyers (D., Mich.)
Chairman
House Judiciary Committee
Rep. Chris Cannon (R., Utah)
Ranking Member
House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law
Washington
Click here to read the article reported by Jennifer Hewlett in the Herald Ledger on April 7.
Excerpt:
Credit card interchange fees are “killing” convenience stores that sell gasoline, says Roth Bullock, who owns 16 such stores in Kentucky and Indiana. Since 2000, 12 to 14 large companies operating convenience stores in Kentucky have gone bankrupt, and credit card fees are a big part of the reason, he said.
For every dollar spent on gasoline using a credit card, about 2 cents goes to the credit card company. Credit card interchange fees have risen dramatically in the past several years, and more and more people are using credit cards, as well as debit cards, which also carry fees, to pay for gas.
“It’s the second-largest expense we have besides payroll. It is double what utilities are,” said Bullock, owner of Bullock Oil Co., which operates Cowboy’s Food Stores in Kentucky and Indiana.
“Richard Maxedon, executive director of the Kentucky Petroleum Marketers Association, said that many small gasoline retailers in Kentucky are selling out to larger operators because they can’t afford to stay in business any longer, in part because of card fees.
Click here for more information.
[NEWS UPDATE: Olympic Torch Snuffed Out In Paris]
Click here to read the AP article in The Financial Times
We’re just saying… based on the rash of Federal Reserve and government bail outs to the financial services industry, we can’t help but wonder whether the next target for a giant handout will be Visa, MasterCard and its thousands of member banks when payment due on their merchant interchange antitrust liability comes do, as we expect it will?
Will Wall Street and regulators explain away that the banks again will need financial support to cover their multi billion dollar antitrust liability, should they be found guilty of illegal price-fixing?
[UPDATE, original post on April 1st]
Based on the letter sent to Chase Paymentech customers, we were advised that the announced Visa and MasterCard interchange fee “adjustments” would take place on April 1 and be posted on their website. Well, it’s April 1st and Visa still has the old rates listed.
[Editors note, (April 3) We just checked back today and noticed that Visa's new fee schedule is now online, but try to figure out what each individual payment transaction charge is and why is Visa's only five pages when the MasterCard schedule is more than one-hundred?]
At least MasterCard complied and has the new 103 page rate schedule posted, but click here to see if you can guess what the heck is going on.
For us, the best part of MasterCard’s [April Fool's Day] posting was this gem: “… MasterCard has no involvement in acquirer and merchant pricing policies or agreements.” Good stuff, except when you understand that those that did were the thousands of banks, and with representation on MasterCard’s board of directors which owned MasterCard, prior to the IPO and still maintains a nearly 50% investment.
MasterCard U.S. and Interregional Interchange Rate Programs